Reflective Entry 5
Reflective
Entry 5: Discuss how ethical issues are being addressed while you are taking
action.
At the beginning
of my inquiry my initial thoughts about ethical practices was to follow the
duty of care, like most teachers reflecting on my own practice was first needed
so that student needs could and would be addressed. What ethical issues could
arise if everything we do is to be better our practice for our students?
Considering
the ramifications my enquiry could have on my students more research needed to be
had around ethical guidelines. This led me to confidentiality, as the community
in which I teach is closed of from most outside ideals and teachings. We are governed
by our contracts, which clearly states the need for confidentiality and
protection of our student’s rights as a person first but also as a member of
this community. According to NZARE (2010),
we should report objectively, frankly and without prejudice. Ensuring that my
students and the community are well informed before hand and that they feel their
values are being respected throughout this process has been invaluable to
making this action plan a success. I kept clear lines of communication open
between myself and my students through each stage of my enquiry. Students were
able to ask questions about SDL and student agency and why these are important.
(Horasanlı,
2010)
Keeping
within the lines of confidentiality, all surveys were completed anonymously, even
to myself. Questions around assignment design and the use of CANVAS were added
to this survey and 100% of my class complete the, that enable students to
self-direct. The collected information was the collated and a PDF report was
sent to me. From there, I used the data to inform my action plan and to reflect
on my own pedagogy. Furthermore, I set up a meeting with my principal in order
to share the information with him. Together we set goals for my practice which were
connected to my enquiry around student agency and self-directed learning.
In addition,
many observations were made by my-self, of the students interacting with the digital
platform, while self-directing their learning. In understanding the community
in which I work, rules of student engagement within a digital platform are
limited, I found this hard as I encourage students to explore digital resources
and be digitally creative, while keeping to the parameters of my what is acceptable.
Having taught in state schools with more liberal parameters it was my ethical duty
to respect my school’s community, whanuas’ expectations. Which leads to theory
that ethical practice is not a one size fits all model. (Hall, 2001)
References:
Hall, A. (2001). What
ought I to do, all things considered? An approach to the exploration of ethical
problems by teachers. IIPE Conference for Ethics, Law, Justice and
Governance, Griffith University, NAthan Campus, Brisbane, 8 April, (April).
Retrieved from
http://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/content/download/545/4465/Hall 2001.pdf
Horasanlı, E. (2010).
NZARE Guidelines. Life Sciences, (September), 100. Retrieved from
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.633.8948&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Comments
Post a Comment